The Circuitry
THE CIRCUITRYYour one-stop source for all tech news
HOMETODAYNEWSFEEDEVENTS
BOOKMARKS
RSS
© 2026 The Circuitry
About UsSourcesContactCorrectionsPrivacy
  • Today
  • Feed
  • Events
  • Saved
Scroll for more
Verification
VERIFIEDConfidence: HIGH
Source identified
Claims cross-referenced
No discrepancies found
Fact-check summary

Financial Times first reported Apple's UK Supreme Court appeal over the $502M Optis FRAND ruling; corroborated by Reuters, Sisvel, court records and other coverage.

Sourcing
1source

via 9to5Mac

9to5Mac · track record
79Stories
100%Verified
630d
All sources →
Markets
AAPL···

Live quote · not investment advice

From The CircuitryWhy The Circuitry

Verified tech news, cross-checked.

Every story is checked against independent sources before it posts — no rumors dressed up as fact.

How we verify →
Home/Tech/Apple asks Supreme Court to slash $502M Optis patent license bill
VERIFIEDBy Xavier Rivera· ·2 min read

Apple asks Supreme Court to slash $502M Optis patent license bill

Apple is urging the UK Supreme Court to reverse a ruling that raised its patent licensing obligation to Optis Wireless from $56 million to $502 million, arguing the appellate methodology was flawed and arbitrary.

Source:9to5Mac
Post
Apple asks Supreme Court to slash $502M Optis patent license bill
From The CircuitryWhy The Circuitry

Verified tech news, cross-checked.

Every story is checked against independent sources before it posts — no rumors dressed up as fact.

How we verify →
TL;DRAI · 60 sec read

Apple asks the UK Supreme Court to cut a $502 million Optis Wireless patent license fee for 4G and LTE technology used in iPhones and other devices. The case, ongoing since 2019, now centers on FRAND royalty terms after an appeals court raised the amount ninefold. The three-day hearing begins this week and will shape future wireless patent licensing rates.

Apple is seeking to overturn an order that would force the company to pay Optis Wireless approximately $502 million for a worldwide license on 4G and LTE patents, with arguments scheduled before the UK’s highest court this week.

The dispute dates back to 2019. The Texas-based wireless technology owner has claimed in parallel American and British lawsuits that various iPhones, iPads and Apple Watch models equipped with LTE violate its intellectual property. Both sides have exchanged victories and defeats across multiple appeals in the years since the litigation began.
Optis counters that Apple has repeatedly tried to evade fair payments and leveraged its size to drive royalties down.

A recent American jury found in Apple’s favor after two earlier verdicts awarding Optis $506 million and then $300 million were thrown out. In February the iPhone maker was cleared of infringing all five patents at issue. Optis told 9to5Mac that it anticipates “a further review of the jury’s verdict by the U.S. District Court and Federal Circuit.”

The UK case now focuses on FRAND licensing terms. The current British proceedings no longer examine infringement itself but instead address the proper payment for using the technology on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms. A London High Court initially set the fee at $56 million in 2023; last year the appellate panel raised that sum ninefold to $502 million.
From The CircuitryThe Feed — live briefs across tech, all day.See what’s happening →

The higher tribunal partly based its valuation on an existing Optis agreement with Google and decided royalties should run from 2013 rather than applying the six-year cap endorsed by the lower court. Apple has asked the Supreme Court to examine both the total and the approach used to reach it.
Qualcomm is opposing the appeal as well, warning that Apple’s stance deviates from standard industry practices and could reduce motivation for future innovation.

Apple argues the appeal court erred in law. According to the Financial Times, Apple contends the appellate judges “erred in law” and that the chosen valuation method was “arbitrary.” Optis counters that Apple has repeatedly tried to evade fair payments and leveraged its size to drive royalties down. Qualcomm is opposing the appeal as well, warning that Apple’s stance deviates from standard industry practices and could reduce motivation for future innovation.
From The CircuitryWhy The Circuitry

Verified tech news, cross-checked.

Every story is checked against independent sources before it posts — no rumors dressed up as fact.

How we verify →
The Supreme Court hearing begins this week. A five-judge panel will consider the matter across three days of hearings. The Financial Times first reported Apple’s latest move.
Why this mattersAI · ~100 words

Tap a lens to see what this story means for you.

Morning Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning.

Two minutes, free forever. What's in The Brief →

Reader-supported
DonateBuy me a coffee →Follow@thecircuitry_ →Follow@thecircuitry.to →
HELP US IMPROVE
From The Circuitry

See what’s happening right now

The Feed runs all day — short, verified briefs the moment they break.

Open the Feed →
From The Circuitry

Follow @thecircuitry_

Every story we publish, as it happens. No noise between.

Follow on X ↗On Bluesky ↗

Reader-supported

The Circuitry is a passion project I've always wanted to build, and I love the work behind it.

Running it costs real money. APIs, hosting, time. To keep improving the site and growing this into something useful for everyone, those costs have to be covered.

Any contribution is appreciated. If not, no pressure. Thanks for reading.

Buy me a coffee
ApplePatentsLegal
More from9to5Mac
  • Bloomberg: Apple plans first touchscreen MacBook Pros for October 27

    Tech · 16h
  • Ring launches first smart lock with manual charging at $249

    Tech · 1d
  • Apple watchOS beta, screenless tracker plans, and CarPlay updates surface

    Tech · 15d
More inTech
  • GlobalFoundries signs $2B TSMC deal for US silicon interposers

    Tech · 10h
  • SpaceX agrees to buy 800 MHz spectrum for Starlink Mobile

    Tech · 13h
  • Microsoft discloses CVE-2026-83947 in Azure Event Grid

    Tech · 13h
SupportThe Work

The Circuitry is reader-supported. If you find the daily brief useful, you can buy me a coffee to keep it going.

Buy a coffee →
From The CircuitryWhy The Circuitry

Verified tech news, cross-checked.

Every story is checked against independent sources before it posts — no rumors dressed up as fact.

How we verify →

MORE IN THIS BEAT

All Tech →
  • Tech· 

    Apple Hit with $5.7 Billion Verdict in Taction Technology Haptic Patent Case

    A federal jury in San Diego ordered Apple to pay Taction Technology more than $5.7 billion after finding that the Taptic Engine in iPhones and Apple Watches infringed two Taction haptic patents. The jury found the infringement was not willful, and Apple says it will appeal.

  • Tech· 

    Bloomberg: Apple plans first touchscreen MacBook Pros for October 27

    Bloomberg reports Apple will launch its first touchscreen MacBook Pros, a new iPad mini, and other models on or around October 27 with an online presentation and in-person press event. The products target creative professionals and include OLED displays across multiple lines.

  • Tech· 

    MacRumors: Gurman Says OLED MacBook Pro Won't Be Significantly Thinner

    MacRumors: Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has walked back earlier reports that the upcoming OLED MacBook Pro would be significantly thinner. The models are now described as significantly lighter only, with launch still expected later this month.

  • Tech· 

    MacRumors: Apple Plans Two October Product Launch Events

    MacRumors: Multiple sources indicate Apple intends to hold two separate rounds of product announcements during October, covering home devices on the 13th plus Macs and other hardware later in the month along with the iPhone Duo.

  • Tech· 

    Gurman: EU Siri AI Delay Could Last Five Months or More

    Bloomberg's Mark Gurman says EU iPhone and iPad users may wait five months or more for Apple's upgraded Siri AI as Apple negotiates over the bloc's digital rules.