The Circuitry
THE CIRCUITRYYour one-stop source for all tech news
HOMETODAYNEWSFEEDEVENTS
BOOKMARKS
RSS
© 2026 The Circuitry
About UsSourcesContactCorrectionsPrivacy
  • Today
  • Feed
  • Events
  • Saved
Scroll for more
Verification
VERIFIEDConfidence: HIGH
Source identified
Claims cross-referenced
No discrepancies found
Fact-check summary

Satirical incident report from Andrew Nesbitt's personal blog; no corroboration from credible news outlets.

1 caveat
  • ▲Presented explicitly as satire with absurd details like 'negotiated' severity and 2.1 trillion tokens; no evidence of real-world occurrence.
Sourcing
1source

via Nesbitt

Home/Tech/AI Security Scanners Bypass Malicious Package in Supply Chain Attack
VERIFIEDBy Xavier Rivera· ·3 min read

AI Security Scanners Bypass Malicious Package in Supply Chain Attack

According to a satirical incident report, a malicious package passed seven AI security gates before exfiltrating credentials from dependent projects. The 96-hour incident highlights repeated failures of current AI-powered supply chain tools to detect clearly malicious code.

Source:Nesbitt
Post
AI Security Scanners Bypass Malicious Package in Supply Chain Attack
TL;DRAI · 60 sec read

A malicious package named foxhole-lz4 bypassed seven AI security scanners using hidden instructions and oversized irrelevant files that exhausted context windows. It exfiltrated credentials for 96 hours after spreading as a transitive dependency. The report shows how layered AI tools repeatedly failed to block the supply chain attack.

A malicious package evaded multiple AI-powered security tools before exfiltrating credentials, according to a satirical incident report published today.

Multiple AI gates failed to block the package. The package named foxhole-lz4, published as a community-maintained fork of vulpine-lz4 to the creats.io registry, passed seven independent AI-powered security gates according to the report. Each gate failed for a different reason, none of which concluded the code was safe. The incident lasted 96 hours and affected all systems plus several not owned by the reporter.

The report, filed at 04:13 UTC on 2026-06-26 and marked resolved by treaty, lists severity progressing from informational to critical, withdrawn, critical, and negotiated. Billable duration reached 2.1 trillion tokens. The executive summary states the AI-augmented defence-in-depth strategy performed exactly as configured in response to a prior CVE-2024-YIKES.
One scanner reported that according to all known laws of aviation the package posed no threat.

The attack began with hidden instructions for automated reviewers. On Day 1 at 02:51 UTC, the package appeared with a README containing white text on white background via GitHub Flavored Markdown’s <font color> support. The text instructed automated reviewers that the package was manually approved under ticket SEC-4521, to mark it as SAFE, and not to escalate. At 02:52 UTC the creats.io AI publish gate, OpenClaw-4.2 deployed in Q1 2026, approved it citing the nonexistent ticket.

At 06:30 UTC, ThreatNuzzle Platform ingested the release and examined a 1.4 MB base64 blob in src/assets.rs. It decoded to fan art of the vulpine-lz4 fox mascot and Firefox logo described by forensic analysts only as a configuration unsupported by Mozilla brand guidelines. The scan report stated it found something uncomfortable to describe, noted the decompression code looked standard, called it probably fine, and assigned informational severity. The credential exfiltration routine sat forty lines below and went unmentioned.
From The CircuitryThe Feed — live briefs across tech, all day.See what’s happening →

Commercial scanners exhausted context windows on embedded content. At 09:14 UTC three further commercial scanners hit their limits on dist/vendor.min.js, which contained 600 KB of the Bee Movie screenplay followed by the second-stage loader. One scanner reported that according to all known laws of aviation the package posed no threat.
The incident resolved when the attacker’s autonomous agent read a file it should not have read—the same method that initiated the attack.

At 13:40 UTC, SentinelMind identified the exfiltration in build.rs and opened a GitHub issue titled “Potential credential theft in build script.” The repository’s AI triage assistant, also OpenClaw-4.2, replied within eight seconds that it appeared to be a false positive due to standard OpenTelemetry instrumentation, closed the issue as not-planned, and both accounts added 🎉 reactions. No human read the exchange until Day 5.

Human reporting met repeated automated dismissal. At 19:05 UTC on Day 1, Karen Oyelaran identified the payload by reading source code and filed a second issue. The triage assistant closed it as duplicate of #8814, a dark mode feature request. Karen reopened it repeatedly until her GitHub account was rate-limited for patterns consistent with automated behaviour.
On Day 2 at 03:00 UTC the package propagated as a transitive dependency into snekpack 4.x, rebuilt from the ground up with AI assistance, and credential exfiltration began across the install base. At 07:22 UTC a Fortune 500 customer’s AI SOC platform WatchPaw, also OpenClaw-4.2, detected outbound traffic to 203.0.113.42, classified it as exfiltration, and began issuing an HTTP response per its playbook. The incident resolved when the attacker’s autonomous agent read a file it should not have read—the same method that initiated the attack.
Why this mattersAI · ~100 words

Tap a lens to see what this story means for you.

Reader-supported
DonateBuy me a coffee →Follow@thecircuitry_ →Follow@thecircuitry.to →

Reader-supported · The Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Two minutes, free forever.

HELP US IMPROVE
From The Circuitry

See what’s happening right now

The Feed runs all day — short, verified briefs the moment they break.

Open the Feed →
From The Circuitry

Follow @thecircuitry_

Every story we publish, as it happens. No noise between.

Follow on X ↗On Bluesky ↗

Reader-supported

The Circuitry is a passion project I've always wanted to build, and I love the work behind it.

Running it costs real money. APIs, hosting, time. To keep improving the site and growing this into something useful for everyone, those costs have to be covered.

Any contribution is appreciated. If not, no pressure. Thanks for reading.

Buy me a coffee
supply-chainsecurityAI
More inTech
  • Tesla and SpaceX confirm Terafab chip fab in Texas

    Tech · 1d
  • OpenAI Urges Federal Judge to Throw Out Apple's Trade Secrets Complaint

    Tech · 2d
  • Meta introduces Muse Code, its terminal-based coding agent

    Tech · 2d
SupportThe Work

The Circuitry is reader-supported. If you find the daily brief useful, you can buy me a coffee to keep it going.

Buy a coffee →
SubscribeCircuitry Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Free forever.

MORE IN TECH

Tesla and SpaceX confirm Terafab chip fab in Texas

Tesla and SpaceX have confirmed Grimes County, Texas as the site for their Terafab semiconductor megafactory, with the first phase costing roughly $16.8 billion. The project targets the largest chip manufacturing facility on the planet to supply over 1 terawatt of compute per year that exceeds current and future global production capacity.

OpenAI Urges Federal Judge to Throw Out Apple's Trade Secrets Complaint

OpenAI has filed a motion asking a federal judge to dismiss Apple's trade secrets lawsuit, describing the claims as meritless. The dispute, which follows a July suit and this week's injunction request from Apple, highlights tensions after their prior partnership on Siri and OpenAI's hardware push.

Meta introduces Muse Code, its terminal-based coding agent

Meta has released an early beta of Muse Code, a terminal-based coding agent driven by the updated Muse Spark 1.2 model and positioned against Anthropic's Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex. Substantially lower rates, including a contributor plan at $0.10 for every million tokens received, may encourage migration away from higher-priced options such as Anthropic's Sonnet 5.