The Circuitry
THE CIRCUITRYYour one-stop source for all tech news
HOMETODAYNEWSFEEDEVENTS
BOOKMARKS
RSS
© 2026 The Circuitry
About UsSourcesContactCorrectionsPrivacy
  • Today
  • Feed
  • Events
  • Saved
Scroll for more
Verification
VERIFIEDConfidence: HIGH
Source identified
Claims cross-referenced
No discrepancies found
Sourcing
1source

via 9to5Mac

9to5Mac · track record
68Stories
100%Verified
530d
All sources →
Markets
AAPL···

Live quote · not investment advice

Home/Tech/Court Grants Apple Request for Samsung Documents in DOJ Antitrust Case
VERIFIEDBy Xavier Rivera· ·1.5 min read

Court Grants Apple Request for Samsung Documents in DOJ Antitrust Case

A New Jersey federal court has approved Apple's request to seek Samsung documents from South Korea in its antitrust defense against the DOJ. The ruling allows the request to advance via the Hague Convention process, though Samsung may still refuse to comply and local authorities must first approve execution.

Source:9to5Mac
Post
Court Grants Apple Request for Samsung Documents in DOJ Antitrust Case
TL;DRAI · 60 sec read

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey grants Apple's request to seek Samsung documents from South Korea in its DOJ antitrust case using the Hague Evidence Convention. The court finds good cause despite DOJ objections to the nine-month delay. Samsung's internal data is key because it competes directly with Apple in smartphones, smartwatches, and app distribution.

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey has approved Apple’s request to seek documents from Samsung in South Korea in its ongoing antitrust case against the Department of Justice.

Last month, Apple moved to obtain internal Samsung data from South Korea in its ongoing antitrust fight with the U.S. government over alleged monopoly practices. In its request, Apple relied on the Hague Evidence Convention, which provides a mechanism for courts to gather evidence from foreign entities in civil or commercial matters.

According to Apple, Samsung is one of the most relevant third parties in the case, given its direct competition across smartphones, smartwatches, and app distribution. However, the company’s U.S. subsidiary said it would not produce records held by its Korean parent company.
From The CircuitryThe Feed — live briefs across tech, all day.See what’s happening →
The DOJ criticized the timing of Apple’s request, saying the company shouldn’t have waited nine months to file it. The DOJ also argued that the Hague Convention process should not be used to extend discovery or affect the trial schedule, and that Apple should bear the risk that some or all of the evidence from South Korea may not arrive in time if the court granted the company’s request.

Last Friday, the court granted Apple’s request, saying it “considered the submissions of the parties,” and adding that “good cause” had been shown.
Importantly, the fact that the court has granted Apple’s request doesn’t automatically mean that Samsung will have to produce the documents. Rather, the request will now move through the Hague Convention process in South Korea, where local authorities will decide whether and how to execute it. Even then, Samsung could still object or otherwise refuse to produce some or all of the records Apple is seeking.
Why this mattersAI · ~100 words

Tap a lens to see what this story means for you.

Reader-supported
DonateBuy me a coffee →Follow@thecircuitry_ →Follow@thecircuitry.to →

Reader-supported · The Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Two minutes, free forever.

HELP US IMPROVE
From The Circuitry

See what’s happening right now

The Feed runs all day — short, verified briefs the moment they break.

Open the Feed →
From The Circuitry

Follow @thecircuitry_

Every story we publish, as it happens. No noise between.

Follow on X ↗On Bluesky ↗

Reader-supported

The Circuitry is a passion project I've always wanted to build, and I love the work behind it.

Running it costs real money. APIs, hosting, time. To keep improving the site and growing this into something useful for everyone, those costs have to be covered.

Any contribution is appreciated. If not, no pressure. Thanks for reading.

Buy me a coffee
AppleAntitrustDOJ
More from9to5Mac
  • Tim Cook Marks End of His Tenure Leading Apple Earnings Calls

    Tech · 8d
  • Apple tests AI for Genius Bar, sends letters to ex-staff at OpenAI

    Tech · 17d
  • Apple to launch Upgrade leasing program on July 28

    Tech · 17d
More inTech
  • Tesla and SpaceX confirm Terafab chip fab in Texas

    Tech · 1d
  • OpenAI Urges Federal Judge to Throw Out Apple's Trade Secrets Complaint

    Tech · 2d
  • Meta introduces Muse Code, its terminal-based coding agent

    Tech · 2d
SupportThe Work

The Circuitry is reader-supported. If you find the daily brief useful, you can buy me a coffee to keep it going.

Buy a coffee →
SubscribeCircuitry Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Free forever.

MORE IN TECH

Tesla and SpaceX confirm Terafab chip fab in Texas

Tesla and SpaceX have confirmed Grimes County, Texas as the site for their Terafab semiconductor megafactory, with the first phase costing roughly $16.8 billion. The project targets the largest chip manufacturing facility on the planet to supply over 1 terawatt of compute per year that exceeds current and future global production capacity.

OpenAI Urges Federal Judge to Throw Out Apple's Trade Secrets Complaint

OpenAI has filed a motion asking a federal judge to dismiss Apple's trade secrets lawsuit, describing the claims as meritless. The dispute, which follows a July suit and this week's injunction request from Apple, highlights tensions after their prior partnership on Siri and OpenAI's hardware push.

Meta introduces Muse Code, its terminal-based coding agent

Meta has released an early beta of Muse Code, a terminal-based coding agent driven by the updated Muse Spark 1.2 model and positioned against Anthropic's Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex. Substantially lower rates, including a contributor plan at $0.10 for every million tokens received, may encourage migration away from higher-priced options such as Anthropic's Sonnet 5.